Snow College General Education Committee
October 29, 2012
In attendance: Richard Squire, Melanie Jenkins, Clinton King,
Mel Jacobsen, Susan Larsen (Advisement), Jeff Carney (chair)
Communication with Richfield was not working, so Rick White and LaFaun did not participate.
Clinton moved, with Melanie seconding, that the minutes of 10.22 be approved. The
                  motion was carried unanimously.
Jeff reported that the Curriculum Committee had given its blessing to the proposed
                  policies appended to last week's minutes, with the proviso that the following text
                  be added to what (was) Item 3: "This process does not replace any other course approval
                  process that may also be in place." Mel Jacobsen moved to amend the policy to include
                  that text. Richard seconded the motion, and it was carried unanimously. Jeff mentioned
                  that a policy had been omitted from list of proposed policies that he believed should
                  be added. He believed that the committee was already operating as if the policy were in
                  place. The policy is as follows: "The General Education Committee determines General
                  Education Outcomes and General Education distribution requirements." Clinton moved,
                  with Richard seconding, that the policy be approved. The motion was carried. This
                  is now Policy Item 2. The amended policy document is appended to these minutes.
Jeff reported that immediately prior to this meeting he had met with the Deans' Council
                  to discuss the proposed policies and to alert the deans that all GE Area Stakeholders
                  are expected to draft a GE Definition Document before breaking for Christmas. As the
                  GE Committee is not administratively linked to the Deans' Council, this was an informational
                  meeting only. Jeff said that although the discussion was generally favorable, Dan
                  Black (Math  and Science) and Sue Dalley (Social and Behavioral Science) indicated
                  that they had a few reservations, and that they would express them in the future.
During the course of the week, it was decided via email that the time of this meeting
                  would be changed to 7:00 AM on Mondays to accommodate Joseph Papenfuss and Rick Wheeler;
                  Rick is the new representative from Fine Arts and Communication.
The following policy is submitted for approval:
1. The attached General Education Committee Constitution.
Effective: Immediately
Justification: In the past, General Education at Snow College has been administered with
                  varying degrees of rigor and laxity that are inconsistent with other colleges and our
                  own dedication to excellence. Because existing governing bodies on campus lack the
                  resources to extend their own missions, the Curriculum Committee, the Faculty Senate,
                  and the Vice President for Academic affairs have agreed that a new body should oversee
                  the General Education Committee. Since 2011, an ad hoc committee has acted in this
                  capacity, contributing in part to our recent accreditation success. The General Education
                  Committee Constitution will formalize this body. Assuming the General Education Committee
                  Constitution is approved, the following additional policies are submitted for approval:
2. The General Education Committee determines General Education Outcomes and
General Education distribution requirements.
Effective: Immediately
Justification: The Curriculum Committee used to be responsible for these tasks. Since
                  the responsibility for assessing the effectiveness for the GE Program has shifted
                  to the GE Committee, it is fitting that the responsibility for determining the outcomes
                  and content of the program should belong to the GE Committee as well.
3. A document that generally defines an ideal course in each GE area (e.g., American Institutions,
                  Math, Fine Arts) will be written by the appropriate stakeholders, subject to approval
                  by the GE Committee. GE Definition Documents are reviewed every five years. GE courses
                  will not be approved or re-approved until an appropriate definition has been approved.
                  Exceptions will be granted on a course-by-course basis, and only when sufficient need
                  has been demonstrated.
Effective: As soon as possible, and no later than December 1, 2012.
Justification: Consistency is essential to ensuring a quality program. In the absence of
                  such a document, there can be no certainty that any two courses conveying the same
                  GE credit are in any way commensurate. When the college certifies that a student has
                  met a GE outcome, there must be reasonable assurance that the student has acquired
                  a body of knowledge and set of skills that are on par with (which is not to say identical
                  to) the knowledge and skills acquired by every other student who is likewise certified.
4. The General Education Committee approves new and revised Master Course Syllabi for
                  courses that earn GE credit toward the AS and AA degrees. The GE Committee reviews
                  existing GE courses to determine if they warrant a GE designation. Such reviews are
                  undertaken in the open and in consultation with all appropriate stakeholders and with
                  reference to the appropriate GE Definition documents. This process does not replace
                  any other course approval process that may also be in place.
Effective: Immediately
Justification: General Education Committee is charged with ensuring the quality and
                  coherence of the General Education Program. The most effective means by which this
                  task can be accomplished is by ensuring the quality of the individual courses that
                  make up the program.
5. A course that conveys GE credit teaches and assesses at least one course-specific
                  or discipline-specific reading strategy. Petitions to exclude a course from this policy will
                  be considered by the GE Committee.
Effective: New and revised courses, upon approval; all others, March 1, 2014.
Justification: Recent assessments indicate that Snow College students have average reading
                  skills. A core theme of the college is excellence; average does not constitute excellence.
6. A course that conveys GE credit teaches and assesses at least one course-specific
                  or discipline-specific analytical, critical, or creative thinking skill. Petitions
                  to exclude a course from this policy will be considered by the GE Committee.
Effective: New and revised courses, upon approval; all others, March 1, 2014.
Justification: National assessments, including interviews with corporate leaders, indicate
                  that college graduates in general lack the critical thinking skills necessary to succeed
                  in the 21st century workforce.
7. A course that conveys GE credit introduces students, at a very basic level, to
                  the methods by which knowledge is made in the discipline. Petitions to exclude a course from
                  this policy will be considered by the GE Committee.
Effective: New and revised courses, upon approval; all others, March 1, 2014.
Justification: Knowledge does not come into existence on its own. A student who learns
                  only course content without also knowing the basic methods with which content is made
                  has an incomplete understanding of higher education.
8. The GE Committee establishes schedules by which assessments of individual GE outcomes
                  are made, and by which initial reports and updates are submitted. The GE Committee
                  establishes guidelines for writing the reports described above. The GE Committee expects
                  that members of the faculty who have been tasked with assessing a GE outcome will
                  do so on time and with reasonable care. The GE Committee publishes assessment schedules,
                  notifies stakeholders of forthcoming assessments, and communicates with assessment
                  teams frequently and whenever requested to do so.
Effective: Immediately
Justification: The GE Committee is charged with assessing the GE program on a continuous
                  basis. Research indicates that assessment of any learning outcome is best carried
                  out by the faculty who hold a stake in it. Experience also indicates that faculty
                  carry out tasks most efficiently, and are most willing to be held accountable for
                  doing so, when timetables and expectations are as clear as possible. Adherence to
                  rigorous schedules and consistent documentation also facilitates the accreditation
                  process.